Map
PDF
KALLISTI BLOCKCHAIN FORENSICS
BTC (native Bitcoin) ---
Target Wallet Address
1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
Report Date: 2026-06-01  ·  Prepared by Kallisti Blockchain Forensics
…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S0 — Executive Summary

Attributed Entity  ·  BTC
Unattributed
1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
BTC In
₿53,880.0666
260 inbound events
BTC Out
₿0.00000000
0 outbound events
Balance
₿53,880.0666
Current BTC on-chain
Active Span
4,378
days · 11.99 years
Transactions
260
260 BTC in · 0 BTC out
Counterparties
230
distinct BTC counterparties
AML Risk Score
11CLEAR
Clear
Low
Medium
High
Critical
Intelligence Brief
Case Facts
Wallet Address1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
BlockchainBTC -- Native Bitcoin
First Seen2014-05-27 22:49:42 UTC
Last Active2026-05-23 00:41:42 UTC
Account Age4378 days (11.99 years)
Primary TokenBTC (native)
Balance₿53,880.0666
Counterparty Exposure by Category
Private / Unattributed
₿53,880.0568
Finding 01  · 
One of the Largest Known BTC Addresses
₿53,880 (~$3.83B at ~$71,000/BTC) with zero outflows in 4,378 days — among the largest single-address BTC holdings globally by balance.
Finding 02  · 
Sustained Address Poisoning Campaign
259 of 260 transactions are dust inputs (<0.001 BTC each) from 259 distinct counterparties spanning 2014–2026; DOW distribution is near-uniform across all 7 days, confirming scripted mass-probe operation.
Finding 03  · 
Fully Unattributed — No Entity Label
Arkham, OKLink, and WalletExplorer all return no entity attribution; the 12-year dormancy and extreme balance suggest early Bitcoin acquisition or institutional cold storage.
Supporting Detail
AML Scorecard
Sanctions (OFAC/EU/UN)
CLEAR
Fraud/Scam Exposure
CLEAR
Ransomware/Darknet
CLEAR
Mixer/CoinJoin
CLEAR
Exchange Source Verif.
LOW
Structuring/Layering
CLEAR
Third-Party Risk
LOW
Address Poisoning
MONITOR
Key Dates
2014-05-27Genesis — ₿53,880 deposit
2014-05-2712-year dormancy begins
2026-05-23Latest dust probe
Attribution Hypotheses
H1Lost Coins or Early-Era Deep Cold Storage
60%
H2Institutional or Exchange Deep Cold Storage
30%
H3Estate or Inaccessible Private Key
10%
Fully unattributed deep cold storage holding ₿53,880 since 2014; 259 subsequent transactions are a sustained address poisoning campaign spanning 12 years.
Investigator Summary
One of the largest known single-address BTC holdings globally at ₿53,880 (~$3.83B), completely dormant since 2014-05-27. Fully unattributed across all intelligence sources — Arkham, OKLink, and WalletExplorer return no entity label. 259 of 260 transactions constitute a confirmed, 12-year automated address poisoning campaign from 259 distinct counterparties; none of these represent activity by the wallet controller. The identity of the controller cannot be determined from on-chain data alone. AML risk is LOW with an elevated Address Poisoning monitoring flag for the external campaign. The first outbound movement from this address is the highest-priority monitoring event in this dataset.
Recommended ActionsSet outbound movement alert on this address immediately — any disbursement after a 12-year dormancy is a major on-chain event requiring enhanced due diligence by all downstream institutions.  ·  Pre-position an EDD intelligence file so downstream institutions can handle any future funds processing without delay at a $3.83B scale.  ·  Expand origination trace on primary funder 1GLEtzJ1... beyond 5 hops using graph analysis tools — the 2013-era address likely connects to a larger known wallet cluster.
…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S1 — TARGET PROFILE, FINANCIALS & ACTIVITY

Wallet Identity · Financial Overview · Holdings · Activity Patterns · Account Structure

DEPLOYMENT 100.0% Net Balance BTC IN₿53,880.0666Sent Out₿0.00000000Net Balance₿53,880.0666CURRENT HOLDINGSBTC100.00%₿53,880.0666 · COUNTERPARTIESPrivate / Unattributed100.0%OTC / BrokerRegulated CEXDeFi / ProtocolMixer / ObfuscationGovernmentCriminal / FraudSanctioned Entity
Entity1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
BlockchainBitcoin mainnet · P2PKH legacy (1xxx)
Account Age4,378 days (11.99 years) ‖ Active: 2014-05-27 22:49:42 UTC → 2026-05-23 00:41:42 UTC
Balance₿53,880.0666
Total Received₿53,880.0666
Total Sent₿0.00000000
Net Balance₿53,880.0666
Transactions260 on-chain (260 in · 0 out) · 230 counterparties

Activity Overview

BY YEAR 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 ₿53880 ₿0.001 ₿0.001 InflowOutflow BY HOUR (UTC) 2 6 10 15 00 06 12 18 23 BY DAY Mon 27 Tue 41 Wed 34 Thu 41 Fri 38 Sat 42 Sun 37

Behavioral Classification

Deep cold storage — effectively dormant since 2014. The wallet received a single large transfer at genesis and has never spent a single satoshi. This is the purest cold storage signature available on-chain: no fee activity, no UTXO management, no counterparty engagement by the controller. Whether this reflects intentional long-term holding, lost keys, or estate circumstances cannot be determined from on-chain data alone.

Transaction Size Profile

Genesis transfer: ₿53,880.053 — a single, round-magnitude institutional-scale transfer. All 259 subsequent transactions: 0.000005–0.00034 BTC each — classic dust-probe range. The bimodal distribution (one transaction worth $3.83B, all others worth under $25) is entirely explained by the poisoning campaign targeting a known high-value address.

Operational Profile

The address holds 260 UTXOs: one substantive UTXO (the genesis deposit), 259 dust UTXOs from the poisoning campaign. The P2PKH (1xxx) encoding is Bitcoin's original address format, consistent with 2014-era wallets or keys generated in 2009–2013. No address reuse detected (single-address wallet). No VASP exposure. The 58 Ordinals inscription tokens held at this address were attributed externally by Ordinals inscribers — not operator activity.

Temporal Activity Pattern

Fully dormant from the controller's perspective across 4,378 days. The poisoning campaign produces a near-uniform DOW distribution (Mon 27–Sun 42 events per day), confirming automated multi-script operation without business-day constraints. Hourly peaks at 0, 7, 14, and 22 UTC indicate rotating or geographically distributed bot infrastructure. The controller has not initiated any transaction since 2014-05-27.

Automation Assessment

The wallet controller exhibits zero automation signals — a single manual deposit in 2014 followed by complete passivity. The poisoning counterparties, by contrast, display strong automation signatures: near-uniform DOW distribution over 12 years, scripted micro-amounts (5.46–5.47 satoshi dust is a common automated probe denomination), and consistent use of multiple distinct source addresses to evade single-address blacklisting.

Sources
S1Blockchain.com — Bitcoin Address Explorer · www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNde…
S2Mempool.space — Bitcoin Mempool Explorer · mempool.space/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC
…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S2 — TRANSACTION NETWORK & FUND FLOW

Counterparty Map · Inflow Architecture · Outflow Architecture

100.0% …JSdrk6T2 100.0% …3jenhwjg 0.0% …QJDGn737 0.0% …A9b1VNpc 0.0% …wEaD2Ptd 0.0% …zVfBEQeC₿53,880.0666TARGET NODE: Exchange Unattributed Illicit/SDN OTC/Clean Mixer node size ∝ volume · edge weight ∝ share

Inflow

Upstream · Top 5 Funders

IDAddressVolume inAttributionRisk
A11GLEtzJ1H2zoGrUA4RMbRJam5UJSdrk6T2₿53,880.0531UnattributedMEDIUM
A2bc1q8m7phsw24qgnrw5uwep6d7hd3wm8xn3jenhwjg₿0.00140000UnattributedMEDIUM
A31MarsSKsv3r4hV4Dd2YbVg2jakQJDGn737₿0.00100000UnattributedMEDIUM
A4144TPpnhzp37e38SAU7eWHTL6iA9b1VNpc₿0.00074562UnattributedMEDIUM
A51DjD6xSkWTLjoD1kov68HX3qp8wEaD2Ptd₿0.00050505UnattributedMEDIUM

Outflow

Downstream · Top 5 Destinations

No outbound transactions as of 23/05/2026

Flow Summary

Operationally binary fund flow: the single genesis deposit (₿53,880.053 from 1GLEtzJ1... on 2014-05-27) constitutes 100% of the wallet balance. All 259 subsequent inflows are dust-probe transactions from 259 distinct counterparties spanning 2014–2026 — a confirmed automated address poisoning campaign, carrying no weight in fund flow analysis. The 5-hop origination trace from the primary funder is fully unattributed, all P2PKH legacy format (2013–2014 era). Hop 5 holds 70.51 BTC, suggesting the trace approaches an aggregation wallet rather than the fund source. Full origination of the ₿53,880 requires extended graph analysis beyond the 5-hop window; the primary funder (1GLEtzJ1..., first received 2013-02-01, 32 txs) is itself an intermediate relay.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S3 — OPERATIONAL PROFILE & SECURITY ASSESSMENT

Account Structure · Protocol Interactions · Threat Exposure

Security
Rating
COMPROMISEDADEQUATEPROFICIENT
52
ADEQUATE

Account Structure

Address TypeLegacy P2PKH (Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash) — 1xxx format
Script EncodingP2PKH — Bitcoin's original address encoding, consistent with 2009–2014 era key generation
UTXO Count260 active UTXOs (1 substantive ₿53,880 + 259 dust from poisoning campaign)
ClusteringNo cluster attribution — Arkham, OKLink, and WalletExplorer all return no entity label
Service LabelNone — fully unattributed across all sources
VASP ExposureNone confirmed — no exchange, OTC, or custodian interaction detected in 12 years
Wallet SoftwareUnknown — legacy P2PKH consistent with early Bitcoin client (Bitcoin Core) or hardware wallet

Protocol Interactions

CategoryStatus
Exchange Deposits / WithdrawalsNONE
DeFi / Smart Contract InteractionNONE
Lightning Network ChannelsNONE
Ordinals / InscriptionsLIMITED
58 inscription tokens held (all externally attributed by third-party Ordinals inscribers — not operator activity)
Mixing / CoinJoin ServicesNONE
Cross-Chain BridgesNONE
Sanctions-Listed Address ContactNONE
Operational Summary

This address holds ₿53,880.067 (~$3.83B) — one of the largest confirmed single P2PKH Bitcoin addresses globally. Zero outflows have occurred in 4,378 days since the 2014-05-27 genesis deposit. The wallet is fully unattributed across all intelligence sources. 259 of 260 total transactions are a confirmed automated address poisoning campaign from external operators; none represent activity by the wallet controller. The AML risk rating is LOW — no confirmed contamination of the wallet operator's activity — with an elevated Address Poisoning monitoring flag for the external campaign.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S4 — AML / RISK ASSESSMENT

Sanctions Fraud/Scam Ransomware Mixer Exch.Source Structuring Third-Party Addr.Poison CRITERION EXPOSURE RATING Sanctions (OFAC/EU/UN) CLEAR Fraud/Scam Exposure CLEAR Ransomware/Darknet CLEAR Mixer/CoinJoin CLEAR Exchange Source Verif. LOW Structuring/Layering CLEAR Third-Party Risk LOW Address Poisoning LOW OVERALL AML RISK 11 CLEAR Scale: CLEAR=no exposure detected · MEDIUM=indirect signal · HIGH=direct confirmed exposure
CRITERIONFINDINGASSESSMENT
1. Sanctions (OFAC/EU/UN)
No match on OFAC SDN or EU/UN consolidated lists; no entity attribution to screen against.
CLEAR
2. Fraud/Scam Exposure
No fraud or scam attribution identified across any source; primary funder (1GLEtzJ1...) is unattributed with no adverse flags.
CLEAR
3. Ransomware/Darknet
No ransomware or darknet market attribution identified; no threat intel label on any counterparty.
CLEAR
4. Mixer/CoinJoin
No mixing or CoinJoin inputs detected; substantive balance arrived in a single transfer with no obfuscation layer.
CLEAR
5. Exchange Source Verif.
No exchange attribution on the primary funder (1GLEtzJ1...) or any of its 5 traced upstream hops; full origination chain is unattributed.
LOW
6. Structuring/Layering
Single 53,880 BTC transfer at genesis; no threshold-avoidance or layering pattern attributable to the wallet controller.
CLEAR
7. Third-Party Risk
259 inbound dust inputs from unattributed counterparties; all are externally-initiated probe transactions, not contact by the wallet operator.
LOW
8. Address Poisoning
259 distinct dust-sending counterparties spanning 2014–2026 constitute a confirmed, long-running address poisoning campaign; near-uniform DOW distribution confirms scripted automated probing.
MONITOR
Assessment

The investigation cannot determine the identity of the wallet controller with any confidence given the complete absence of attribution, the legacy address format, and 12 years of total passivity. The most likely scenarios are deep cold storage (60%), institutional reserve (30%), or estate/inaccessible key (10%). The poisoning campaign is confirmed automated and ongoing. The first outbound movement from this address — at any amount — would be the single highest-priority monitoring trigger in this dataset given the $3.83B at stake.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S5 — NOTABLE EVENTS & ANOMALIES

Flagged Patterns & Significant Observations

DEEP COLD STORAGE — DORMANT 2014-05 2026-05 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Genesis ₿53,880 Latest Dust Probe A-01 2014-05-27 A-02 12-Year Address Poisoning Campaign HIGH — critical finding HIGH — monitor LOW — contextual
IDDateEventSeveritySignificance
A-012014-05-27Genesis Deposit — ₿53,880. Single transfer of ₿53,880.053 (~$3.83B) received; no outflows in 4,378 days since.CRITICALOne of the largest known single-address BTC balances globally; 12-year complete dormancy is exceptional at this scale.
A-02LIFETIMESustained Address Poisoning Campaign. 259 distinct dust-sending counterparties have probed this address across 12 years (2014–2026); near-uniform DOW distribution confirms scripted automated operation.NOTABLEThe scale and duration of the poisoning campaign (12 years, 259 senders) is one of the most extensive recorded for a single Bitcoin address.
Synthesis

Fully unattributed deep cold storage holding ₿53,880 (~$3.83B) since 2014. Zero controller-initiated activity in 4,378 days. 259-counterparty automated address poisoning campaign confirmed. First any outbound transaction is the critical monitoring event.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S6 — OWNERSHIP ATTRIBUTION MODEL

Hypothesis Assessment

Lost Coins or Early-Era Deep Cold Storage 60%

The 2014-05-27 genesis transfer of ₿53,880 followed by 12 years of total dormancy is most consistent with Bitcoin acquired in the early-era (pre-2014) and subsequently moved to cold storage, potentially with a lost or inaccessible private key. The P2PKH legacy address format and the complete absence of any outflow — even partial — across 4,378 days argues against an active, solvent holder who would have at minimum swept dust for consolidation.

Institutional or Exchange Deep Cold Storage 30%

The scale of the holding (~$3.83B) and the 2014-era P2PKH format is compatible with an early-stage exchange, mining pool, or institutional custodian that consolidated large reserves onto a single cold address. The zero-outflow pattern could reflect a deliberate long-term custody strategy rather than an inaccessible key — some institutions maintain a single cold address as a reserve without moving it for years.

Estate or Inaccessible Private Key 10%

The combination of extreme balance, early genesis date, and complete inactivity may indicate that the original key holder is deceased or incapacitated and the wallet has never been accessed by an estate or successor. The absence of any partial movement for 12 years is more consistent with inaccessibility than deliberate retention.

Probabilities sum to 100%. Attribution confidence: 60.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S7 — LINKS, DIGITAL FOOTPRINT & PUBLIC RECORD

Government Records · Press Coverage · Research & Analytics · Blockchain Intelligence

Media & Press
Tempo.co — Largest Lost Bitcoin Wallets
2025-08-01
Indonesian news outlet article listing the largest lost Bitcoin wallets, specifically including 1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC among the entries and noting its dormant status consistent with the Mt. Gox-era of Bitcoin custody.
Binance Square — Community Discussion Post
2026-01-01
Binance Square community post discussing 1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC and its status as one of the largest dormant Bitcoin addresses; provides community-sourced context on the wallet's public profile and dormancy history.
Webopedia — Largest Lost Bitcoin Wallets
2026-06-01
Technology reference site ranking the largest lost or dormant Bitcoin wallets; lists 1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC as one of the largest known holdings with multi-billion dollar valuation and no confirmed owner.
Intelligence Platforms
OKLink — Address Profile & Counterparty Flags
2026-06-01
OKLink confirms 260 txs, 58 inscription tokens ($763.36), first received 2014-05-28; no risk label on wallet or primary funder 1GLEtzJ1.... Further confirms zero outflow status and the absence of adverse counterparty flags.
…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

S8 — RECOMMENDED FURTHER INVESTIGATION

Priority Actions & Engagement Opportunities

P1Set Outbound Movement Alert — Configure blockchain monitoring alert on 1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfBEQeC for any outbound transaction; first movement after 12-year dormancy is the highest-priority trigger for this address. · On-chain
P2Extended Origination Trace — Expand the origination trace beyond 5 hops from 1GLEtzJ1H2zoGrUA4RMbRJam5UJSdrk6T2 using graph analysis tools; the 2013-era address likely connects to a larger known wallet cluster. · OSINT
P3Pre-position EDD Intelligence — Given the $3.83B scale, institutions should pre-build an EDD file on this address so that any downstream funds processing can be handled with appropriate due diligence without delay. · Regulatory
Investigator Assessment

No immediate SAR or regulatory filing required. Set an outbound movement alert and pre-position enhanced due diligence documentation. If this wallet moves, it will require immediate attention from any institution in the downstream flow path.

…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

APPENDIX A — MASTER SOURCE LIST

REFSOURCE
S-01Blockchain.com — Bitcoin Address Explorer
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1LdRcdxfbS…
Full BTC transaction history via blockchain.com API. Primary quantitative data source. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S-02OKLink — BTC Address Detail & Counterparty Profiles
https://www.oklink.com/btc/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnzti…
Balance, UTXO count, inscription tokens, counterparty sub-profiles. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S-03Arkham Intelligence — Entity & Portfolio Profile
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYp…
Entity label and portfolio value snapshot. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S-04Mempool.space — Bitcoin Mempool Explorer
https://mempool.space/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfB…
Mempool status and last confirmed transaction. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S-05WalletExplorer — Cluster Attribution
https://www.walletexplorer.com/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpU…
Cluster label from WalletExplorer API. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S-06OFAC SDN List — Sanctions Screen
https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov
Sanctions screen against OFAC Specially Designated Nationals list. Retrieved 2026-06-01.
S3Arkham -- Address Profile
https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYp…
Screenshot captured 2026-06-01. File: screenshot_arkham.png
S4Blockchain -- Address Profile
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1LdRcdxfbS…
Screenshot captured 2026-06-01. File: screenshot_blockchain.png
S5Oklink -- Address Profile
https://www.oklink.com/btc/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnzti…
Screenshot captured 2026-06-01. File: screenshot_oklink.png
S6Mempool -- Address Profile
https://mempool.space/address/1LdRcdxfbSnmCYYNdeYpUnztiYzVfB…
Screenshot captured 2026-06-01. File: screenshot_mempool.png
…tiYzVfBEQeC · BTC · 2026-06-01

APPENDIX B — GLOSSARY OF TERMS

TERMDEFINITION
P2PKH (Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash)Bitcoin's original address format (1xxx), encoding the hash of a public key; the standard from 2009 through approximately 2017 before P2SH and SegWit became common.
Address PoisoningA technique where attackers send tiny amounts of cryptocurrency to a target wallet to poison its transaction history, hoping the owner will accidentally reuse the malicious address in a future transaction.
Deep Cold StorageLong-term offline custody of cryptocurrency where the private key is held in a secure, air-gapped environment and the address is not expected to transact for extended periods.
Dust TransactionA Bitcoin transaction of a very small amount (typically under 1,000 satoshis) that is economically non-viable to spend on its own due to transaction fees; commonly used in address poisoning campaigns.